Dismissed

Kedarling-Bhairavnath Co-Op. Vividh Karyakari Society, through Shri. Bajjirao Ananda Redekar v. Union of India, through Ministry of Finance and Ors.

Bombay HC23 Dec 2014WP/1543/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Bombay, in a batch of three related writ petitions (1543/2014, 1201/2013, 1194/2013), dismissed one as withdrawn while listing two others for fresh admission due to missing order records.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file appropriate proceedings; continuance of ad-interim relief for one month.

Kedarling-Bhairavnath Co-Op. Vividh Karyakari… — Writ and Judicial Review | Bombay HC (2014)

¶1

Chittewan - 1- 21.wp 1543-14 aw 1194-13 aw 1201-13.doc

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶3

WRIT PETITION NO.1543 OF 2014

¶4

KedarlingBhairavnath Coop Vividh Karyakari Society

¶5

) ).. Petitioner.

¶6

V/s

¶7

Union of India and ors. ). Respondents.

¶8

Mr Manoj Mohan Kadam, for petitioner.

¶9

Mr A.R. Varma a/w Mr H.V. Mehta, Dr. G.R. Sharma, Mr D.P. Singh, for respondent No.1.

¶10

Mr S.P. Bharti, for respondent No.2. Mr Tejpal Shrikant Ingale, for respondent No.3.

¶11

CORAM : A.S. OKA & A.S.GADKARI, JJ DATED : 23^rd DECEMBER 2014

¶12

P.C.

¶13

The Learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions of petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition, with liberty to file appropriate proceedings. He seeks continuation of adinterim relief granted earlier.

¶14

We accordingly dismiss the writ petition as withdrawn with liberty as prayed.

¶15

All the contentions of the parties are kept open.

¶16

Adinterim relief in terms of prayer clause (d) granted on 10^th February, 2014, shall continue to operate for one month from today.

¶17

(A.S.GADKARI, J)

¶18

( A.S. OKA, J )

¶19

Chittewan - 2- 21.wp 1543-14 aw 1194-13 aw 1201-13.doc

¶20

N THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶21

WRIT PETITION NO.1201 OF 2013

¶22

Sambhaji Bhau Patil and ors.

¶23

).. Petitioner.

¶24

V/s

¶25

Union of India and ors.

¶26

). Respondents.

¶27

None for the petitioner.

¶28

Mr A.R. Varma a/w Mr H.V. Mehta, Dr. G.R. Sharma, Mr D.P. Singh, for respondent No.1. Mr S.P. Bharti, for respondent No.2. Mr Tejpal Shrikant Ingale, for respondent No.3.

¶29

CORAM : A.S. OKA & A.S.GADKARI, JJ DATED : 23^rd DECEMBER 2014

¶30

P.C.

¶31

The Registry has reconstructed the files of this petition.

¶32

However, the copies of the orders passed in this writ petition are not placed on record. We direct the Registry to place on the files, the copies orders passed in this writ petition.

¶33

As as the Learned Advocate for the petitioner has filed leave note, we directed that this petition shall be listed to 14^th January, 2015 under the caption of “Fresh Admission”.

¶34

(A.S.GADKARI, J)

¶35

( A.S. OKA, J )

¶36

Chittewan - 3- 21.wp 1543-14 aw 1194-13 aw 1201-13.doc

¶37

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶38

WRIT PETITION NO.1194 OF 2013

¶39

Madhav Gangaram Patil and ors.

¶40

).. Petitioners.

¶41

V/s

¶42

Union of India and ors. ). Respondents.

¶43

None for the petitioners. Mr A.R. Varma a/w Mr H.V. Mehta, Dr. G.R. Sharma, Mr D.P. Singh, for respondent No.1. Mr S.P. Bharti, for respondent No.2. Mr Tejpal Shrikant Ingale, for respondent No.3.

¶44

CORAM : A.S. OKA & A.S.GADKARI, JJ DATED : 23^rd DECEMBER 2014

¶45

P.C.

¶46

The Registry has reconstructed the files of this petition.

¶47

However, the copies of the orders passed in this writ petition are not placed on record. We direct the Registry to place on the files, the copies orders passed in this writ petition.

¶48

As as the Learned Advocate for the petitioner has filed leave note, we directed that this petition shall be listed to 14^th January, 2015 under the caption of “Fresh Admission”.

¶49

(A.S.GADKARI, J)

¶50

( A.S. OKA, J )

Kedarling-Bhairavnath Co-Op. Vividh Karyakari Society, through Shri. Bajjirao Ananda Redekar v. Union of India, through Ministry of Finance and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kedarling-Bhairavnath Co-Op. Vividh Karyakari Society, through Shri. Bajjirao Ananda Redekar v. Union of India, through Ministry of Finance and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Anuradha Co. Operative Housing Society, Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Mr. Suresh Vilaschandra Shah Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Mrs. Priya Yogesh Wagh Vs the Maharashtra State Legal Services Authority through Its Secretary and Ors.

Kedarling-Bhairavnath Co-Op. Vividh Karyakari Society, through Shri. Bajjirao Ananda Redekar Vs Union of India, through Ministry of Finance and Ors.

Meenakshi Prabhakar Patil Vs State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Maharashtra Maritime Board Vs Government of India and Ors.