The Bombay High Court dismissed a criminal writ petition challenging a refusal to grant leave to adduce evidence in an appeal against acquittal. The Court found no reason to interfere with the appellate court's exercise of its discretion.
Petition dismissed without dealing with merits of the case.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Cri.W.P. No. 154/12
1
IN THE HIGH COURT AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 154 OF 2012
Satwaji s/o. Sadbaji Nandapurkar
....Petitioner.
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
....Respondents.
Mr. S.S. Paturkar h/f. Mr. M.M. Patil (Beedkar), Advocate for petitioner. Mr. S.K. Tambe, APP for State. Mr. M.M. Joshi, Advocate for respondent Nos. 2 to 12.
CORAM : T.V. NALAWADE, J. DATED : 11th December, 2014.
ORDER :
Cri.W.P. No. 154/12
2
[ T.V. NALAWADE, J. ]
ssc/
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should have interfered with the Additional Sessions Judge's refusal to grant the petitioner leave to lead evidence at the appellate stage.
Satwaji s/o. Sadbaji Nandapurkar
The State of Maharashtra
T.V. Nalawade
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
