Dismissed
Amjadali Allabaksha Shaikh v. Anjum Amjadali Shaikh and Ors.
Bombay HCWP/1525/2013
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
30.wp1525.13.sxw
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1525 OF 2013
Amjadali Allabaksha Shaikh. ... Petitioner. Versus Sou. Anjum Amjadali Shaikh & ors. ... Respondents.
None for petitioner.
Mr. Vishwajeet V. Mohite, advocate for respondent No. 2.
Mr. S.S. Pednekar, APP for State.
CORAM : SMT.SADHANA S. JADHAV,J DATE : JUNE 17, 2014
P.C.:
1 None present for the Petitioner. Present Writ Petition is filed on 28th March, 2013. Counsel for the Petitioner had not appeared on 6/9/2013. Notice was issued on 20/9/2013. There were objections in filing of the Writ Petition. Learned Counsel appearing for the respondent has placed on record photocopy of the certified copy of the application in Criminal Application No. 116 of 2013 dated 16/12/2013 stating therein that the Petitioner has filed Criminal Revision Application No. 24 of 2013 before the District and Sessions Court at Karad on 27/8/2013 challenging the order dated 25/2/2013. The same order is under challenge in the present petition. The copy
Talwalkar 1/2
2 30.wp1525.13.sxw
of the Criminal Application No. 116 of 2013 is taken on record and marked as Article “X”. For the above mentioned reasons, Writ Petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution.
Talwalkar
2/2
Amjadali Allabaksha Shaikh
Sou. Anjum Amjadali Shaikh
Sadhana S. Jadhav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court