Petitioner withdrew the writ petition with the consent of the respondent. The single judge allowed the withdrawal and disposed of the petition as withdrawn.
Withdrawal of the writ petition allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP1438.2003
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD.
WRIT PETITION NO. 1438 OF 2003
Baban S/o Eknath Bhagvat
... Petitioner
Versus
Bharat S/o Chandrabhan Adhav
...Respondent
Mr Shaikh, Advocate h/f Mr V. R. Dhorde, Advocate for petitioner Mr S. P. Chapalgaonkar, Advocate for respondent
CORAM : N. W. SAMBRE, J. DATED : JULY 7TH , 2014.
PER COURT : -
The petitioner has instructed his Counsel vide communication
dated 4th June, 2014, to withdraw the instant writ petition.
Mr Shaikh, learned Counsel holding for Mr V. R. Dhorde, the learned Counsel for the petitioner, based on the said communication prays for withdrawal of the present writ petition.
Request is granted.
Petition stands disposed of as withdrawn.
( N. W. SAMBRE, J. )
Punde
Baban S/o Eknath Bhagvat
Bharat S/o Chandrabhan Adhav
N. W. Sambre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
