Leave to withdraw the writ petition was granted due to subsequent developments; the petition was disposed of as withdrawn.
Leave to withdraw the petition was granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(1)
W.P. No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.1427 OF 2014
Madhav Vishwanath Mathpati
..PETITIONER
VERSUS
The State of Mah. & ors.
..RESPONDENTS
Mr Ajay S. Deshpande, Advocate for petitioner; Mr S.G. Sangle, A.G.P. for respondents no.1 & 2; Mr S.D. Joshi, Advocate for respondent no.3
CORAM : R.M.BORDE &
DATE : 27th February, 2014
PER COURT:
Learned Counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, seeks
leave to withdraw the petition in view of the subsequent
developments. Leave granted. Petition is disposed of as
withdrawn.
N.W. SAMBRE R.M.BORDE
JUDGE JUDGE
amj/wp1427.14
Madhav Vishwanath Mathpati
The State of Mah.
R.M.Borde
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
