Writ petition by security union seeking Board action. Court directed Board to decide on future representations within eight weeks before disposing of the petition.
Direction to Board to communicate decision on representations within eight weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp12174.13.sxw
1/1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE
WRIT PETITION NO. 12174 OF 2013
Maharashtra Suraksha Rakshak Kamgar Union ... Petitioners V/s. Nashik District Security Guards Board & ors. ... Respondents
Ms. Ranjana Todankar for the petitioners. Ms. Lata Desai for respondent no.1.
CORAM : NARESH H. PATIL AND B.P. COLABAWALLA, JJ .
3rd September, 2014.
P.C.
Learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners have already approached the Board. In case any application/representation is received from the petitioners, we direct the Board to take appropriate decision and communicate the same to the petitioners within eight weeks from today.
With aforesaid directions, Writ Petition is disposed of.
(B.P. COLABAWALLA, J.) (NARESH H. PATIL, J.)
L.S. Panjwani, P.A.
Maharashtra Suraksha Rakshak Kamgar Union
Nashik District Security Guards Board
NARESH H. PATIL
B.P. COLABAWALLA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
