The High Court of Bombay Civil Appellate Jurisdiction dismissed a writ petition seeking early hearing of an appeal as infructuous, noting the respondent had already heard the petitioner's appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
kambli
wp-11696-13
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.11696 OF 2013
… M/s.USMS Saffron Co. Inc ...Petitioner v/s. Union of India and ors. ...Respondents
Mr.Prakash Shah for the petitioner. Mr.Piyush Thakkar for the respondents.
CORAM: MOHIT S. SHAH, C.J. & M.S.SANKLECHA, J. DATE : 25 FEBRUARY 2014
P.C.:
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that respondent No.1 has already heard the petitioner's appeal.
CHIEF JUSTICE
(M.S.SANKLECHA, J.)
1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition seeking direction for early hearing of an appeal is maintainable in light of prior hearing of the same matter.
M/s.USMS Saffron Co. Inc
Union of India
Mohit S. Shah
M.S. Sanklecha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
