The Court disposed of Writ Petition No. 10214 of 2013 by allowing the petitioner's application to withdraw the petition, subsequently dismissing it as withdrawn. No substantive legal question was addressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
10214.2013 WP
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 10214 OF 2013
Saiyed Akhtrunisa Ali Hasan ... Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra & others ... Respondent
Mr. B.R. Kedar , Advocate for petitioner Mr. D.R. Kale, A.G.P. for respondent/ State Mr. P.R. Katneshwarkar, Advocate for respondent Nos. 3 to 5
CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE
DATED : 29th APRIL, 2014
PER COURT :
( RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J. )
SDM* April-2014
Saiyed Akhtrunisa Ali Hasan
The State of Maharashtra
RAVINDRA V GHUGE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
