No. 10019 of 2014 & Group IN THE HIGH COURT…
Petitioners permitted to file fresh applications within eight weeks; evaluation to be completed within twelve weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(1) W.P. No. 10019 of 2014 & Group
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AT AURANGABAD.
Writ Petition No. 10019 of 2014
With
Shashikala Prakash Thosar. .. Petitioner. versus Union of India, Through its Principal Secretary, P. Arts Section, Cultural Department, Room No. 202, "D" Wing, Shashtri Bhavan, New Delhi - 110 001. .. Respondent. .........................
| Writ Petition |
No. 10020 With |
of 2014 |
|---|---|---|
| Gangabai w/o. Kachru Maske. versus |
.. Petitioner. | |
| Union of India, Through its Principal Secretary, P. Arts Section, Cultural Department, Room No. 202, "D" Wing, Shashtri Bhavan, New Delhi - 110 001. ......... |
................ | .. Respondent. |
Writ Petition No. 10021 of 2014 With Kachru Yashvanta Maske .. Petitioner.
versus
W.P. No. 10019 of 2014 & Group
Union of India, Through its Principal Secretary, P. Arts Section, Cultural Department, Room No. 202, "D" Wing, Shashtri Bhavan, New Delhi - 110 001. .. Respondent. .........................
Writ Petition No. 10022 of 2014 With Taramati Aashruba Maske .. Petitioner. versus Union of India, Through its Principal Secretary, P. Arts Section, Cultural Department, Room No. 202, "D" Wing, Shashtri Bhavan, New Delhi - 110 001. .. Respondent. .........................
Writ Petition No. 10026 of 2014 Kavita w/o. Bibhishan Dhage .. Petitioner. versus Union of India, Through its Principal Secretary, P. Arts Section, Cultural Department, Room No. 202, "D" Wing, Shashtri Bhavan, New Delhi - 110 001. .. Respondent. .........................
(3) W.P. No. 10019 of 2014 & Group
Mr. M.P. Gude, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. S.B. Deshpande, Assistant Solicitor General, for the respondent.
CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI &
A.M. BADAR, JJ.
DATE : 17TH NOVEMBER 2014
COURT'S ORDER (Per B.P. Dharmadhikari, J.) :
(4) W.P. No. 10019 of 2014 & Group
( A.M. BADAR ) ( B.P. DHARMADHIKARI ) JUDGE JUDGE
puranik / WP10019.14etc
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioners were denied benefits due to the respondent failing to receive their applications.
Whether the High Court should accept representations regarding discrepancy in receipt of applications.
Shashikala Prakash Thosar
Gangabai w/o. Kachru Maske
Kachru Yashvanta Maske
Taramati Aashruba Maske
Kavita w/o. Bibhishan Dhage
Union of India
B.P. DHARMADHIKARI
A.M. BADAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
