Court disposed of Testamentary Suit No.59 of 1994 and Testamentary Petition based on consent terms signed by parties. Decree drawn filed dispensed; case commissioner to act per consent.
Order and decree framed per consent; interim applications disposed; commission activated per consent; decree drawn filed dispensed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
TS No.59_1994
jsn
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
TESTAMENTARY SUIT NO.59 OF 1994 IN
TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO.594 OF 1994
Shirish Anant Pradhan & Anr. … Petitioners Vs.
Dr. Vijay Shantaram Pradhan
… Respondent
Mr. Rupesh Lanjekar, Adv. i/b. Mr. A.G. Damle, Adv. for the petitioners.
Ms. Meenal Shringarpure, Adv. for respondent Nos.4a, 4b & 4d.
CORAM : MRS. ROSHAN DALVI, J. DATE : 20th August, 2014.
P.C. :
Shirish Anant Pradhan & Anr.
Dr. Vijay Shantaram Pradhan
Roshan Dalvi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
