Rustom Padam Bharucha and Anr. v. Perin Padam Bharucha
Bombay HCTP/963/2013
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
This order is a brief listing or administrative notation directing to remove the case file from the board, with no substantive judicial reasoning or decision provided.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
¶2
TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO. 963 OF 2013
¶3
Rustom Padam Bharucha And Anr. ....Petitioner V/S Perin Padam Bharucha ....Respondent
¶4
Ms. Sneha Jaisingh i/b Bharucha And Partners For Petitioner None For Respondent
¶5
CORAM : A. K. MENON, J DATE : 8th April, 2019
¶6
P.C. :
¶7
Remove from board.
¶8
( ASSOCIATE )
¶9
Page 1/1
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Rustom Padam Bharucha
- respondent
Perin Padam Bharucha
Coram
AI extract
A. K. MENON
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Shri C.R. Jaya Sukin Vs the State of Maharashtra and 2 Ors.
Janardhan Gangaram Kottur Vs Kottur @ Kutta Rajaram Sayanna @ Kottur Rajaram Sayanna @ Rajaram Sayanna Kutha (Deceased)
Sandeep Pandurang Shelke Vs Union of India and 2 Ors.
Marzban Dadi Naegamvala Vs Soona Jamset Naegamvala Alias Soona Burjor Pastakia