Hearing on testamentary petition regarding amendment time extension; no substantive decision.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO. 665 OF 2012
KAUSHIK GOKALDAS @ KAUSHIK ....Petitioner. GOKALDAS LAIJAWALA AND ANR
V/S GOKALDAS HARIDAS @ GOKALDAS ....Respondent. HARIDAS LAIJAWALA
Mr. Abhay Patki i/by Pankaj Toprani for Petitioner
CORAM : G.S. PATEL, J DATE : 12th April, 2016
P.C. :
Mentioned,not on board. Time for carrying out amendment is extended by two weeks from today.
(G.S. PATEL, J.)
KAUSHIK GOKALDAS @ KAUSHIK
GOKALDAS HARIDAS @ GOKALDAS
G.S. PATEL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
