The plaintiff failed to provide instructions to their advocate despite a court notice, resulting in no appearance in court. The summary suit was dismissed for want of prosecution.
The summary suit is dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Nitin
980-SS-3261-2002
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
SUMMARY SUIT NO. 3261 OF 2002
Air Force Group Insurance Society … Plaintiff Versus
Pravin V. Sheth & other.
… Defendants
Mr. Mohan i/b. M/s. Thakore Jariwala & Associates for the Plaintiff. None for the Defendants.
CORAM : S.J. KATHAWALLA, J. DATE : 9 TH SEPTEMBER, 2014
P.C. :
be placed before the Court on 30th July 2014, and that their firm – Thakore Jariwala & Associates shall not appear for them on that day and if any adverse orders are passed against them, they will not be held responsible. Despite receipt of the said letter, the Plaintiff has not approached his Advocate M/s. Thakore Jariwala & Associates. The Plaintiff has also not appeared before this Court through its representative or through any other Advocate. In view thereof, the above Summary Suit is dismissed for want of prosecution.
( S.J.KATHAWALLA, J. )
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Summary Suit should be dismissed for want of prosecution due to the plaintiff's failure to appear and provide instructions.
S.J. Kathawalla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
