The High Court dismissed a review petition. The judge held that no further clarification was needed as the impugned order was clear that strikes must be held in accordance with law, a point conceded by the respondents' counsel. The petition was disposed accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 RWP.(L).36/14-NMS.356/13-S.146/13(6)
mnm
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
REVIEW PETITION (L) NO. 36 OF 2014 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 356 OF 2013
IN
SUIT NO. 146 OF 2013
State Bank of India
...Petitioner/Applicant
Vs.
All India State Bank Officers Federation & Ors.
...Respondents
Mr. Hiralal Thakkar, Sr. Advocate a/w. Aarti Khadilkar i/b. Bhave & Co., Advocate for the Petitioner/Applicant
Ms. Mani Prakash i/b. Gayatri Singh, Advocate for the Respondent Nos. 1,3 & 4.
Mr. S.R. Nargolkar a/w. Mr. Aumkar Joshi, Advocate for the Respondent Nos. 2 & 5.
CORAM : MRS. ROSHAN DALVI, J. DATED : 1ST AUGUST, 2014
P.C. :
(ROSHAN DALVI, J.)
State Bank of India
All India State Bank Officers Federation
Roshan Dalvi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
