material were excessive, the complainant had not supplied the details of bills etc. and so, there was no liability. In paragraph No. 4 of the reply, specific admission is given by the accused that the said cheque was issued on account. However, the accused has contended that before presenting the cheque, the complainant was expected to supply all details of bills and account. In paragraph No. 3 of the reply, there is specific contention that payments were made on account and few cheques were deposited with the complainant on account when there was no specific order or consideration payable. The accused has then specifically contended that the cheque in question was issued without any consideration, specific order and it was just issued for security purpose. After taking this defence, suggestion was given to complainant during his cross examination by defence counsel that the payments were not made on bill to bill basis. This suggestion is admitted by the complainant. In defence, the accused has produced a copy of ledger account book at Exh. 61. This Court is discussing the value of this document, but, it can be said that by using the document at Exh. 61, the accused has admitted that the payments were never made on bill to bill basis.
