The court held that the writ was a personal interest litigation and not a genuine public interest litigation, dismissing the petition.
Petition dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
24.pilst.1064.14
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION(st) NO. 1064 OF 2014
Shri Ramchandra B. Shinde ..Petitioner Vs. Talegaon Dabhade Municipal Council Talegaon Dabhade and Anr ..Respondents
..Respondents
Mr. Sugandh B. Deshmukh,for the Petitioner.
CORAM :- S. J. VAZIFDAR & B. P. COLABAWALLA , JJ. DATE :- FEBRUARY 21, 2014.
P. C.:
This is purely a personal interest litigation. The petitioner is
always at liberty to adopt appropriate proceedings other than
Public Interest Litigation for the redressal of the grievances.
( B. P. COLABAWALLA, J.) ( S. J. VAZIFDAR, J.)
Aswale 1/1
Shri Ramchandra B. Shinde
Talegaon Dabhade Municipal Council Talegaon Dabhade
Anr
S. J. Vazifdar
B. P. Colabawalla
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
