Ms. Pushpa Chavan and Anr. v. Mahanagar Gas Ltd. and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 37 OF 2003
Ms. Pushpa Chavan and Anr ..Petitioners Vs. Mahanagar Gas Ltd and Ors ..Respondents
Ms. Rekha Musale i/b Ms. Varsha Palav,for the Petitioners. Dr. Birendra Saraf i/b M/s Kanga and Co,for the Respondent No.1. Mr. Mustafa Doctor a/w Mr. Shankh Sengupta,for Respondent No.2. Mr.Pradeep Rajagopal i/b Ms. Rekha Rajagopal, for Respondent No.3.
Mr. Sameer Patil, AGP-State,for Respondent Nos.4 and 7.
CORAM :- S. J. VAZIFDAR & B. P. COLABAWALLA , JJ. DATE :- FEBRUARY 7, 2014.
P. C.:
Mr. Doctor, the learned counsel for respondent no.2 states that respondent no.2 is not a joint venture parter, and therefore,
Aswale 1/2
30.pil.37.03
neither a necessary nor a proper party.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
MS. PUSHPA CHAVAN AND ANR
- respondent
MAHANAGAR GAS LTD AND ORS
Coram
S. J. VAZIFDAR
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court