Public Interest Litigation was disposed of directing authorities to consider the petitioner's application on its own merits without expressing an opinion on the petition's contentions.
Directing the Collector/Police authorities to consider the application tendered by the petitioner on its own merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
pil121.14
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 121 OF 2014
SANJAY VITTHALRAO JADHAV VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Kakde Yuvraj V. AGP for Respondents: Mr. V.D. Godbharle
CORAM : R. M. BORDE AND
V. K. JADHAV, JJ.
DATED : 29th SEPTEMBER, 2014
P.C. :-
2. Writ petition stands disposed of.
( V. K. JADHAV, J.) ( R. M. BORDE, J. )
rlj/
Sanjay Vitthralao Jadhav
The State of Maharashtra
R. M. Borde
V. K. JadHAV
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
