The High Court dismissed notices of motion as infructuous because the underlying writ petition had already been disposed of by an earlier order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
314-13-NMW-4-C=.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 314 OF 2013 WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 315 OF 2013 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 559 OF 2008
Director of Income Tax
.. Appellant
v/s.
Income Tax Settlement Commission & Ors.
.. Respondents
None for the applicant
Mr. Atul Jasani for respondent no.2
CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA &
SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J.J.
DATED : 12th APRIL, 2018. P.C.
that both the Notices of Motion taken out in this petition have become
infructuous as the petition itself stood stands disposed of by order
dated 28th February, 2014.
(SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J.)
(M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)
1 of 1
Uday S. Jagtap
Director of Income Tax
Income Tax Settlement Commission
Assessee
M.S. Sanklecha
Sandeep K. Shinde
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
