Disposed
Pokhraj Himatmal v. Shridhar Vithal Parulkar and Ors.
Bombay HCNMS/439/2014
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
23-NMS-4392014.DOC
ars
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 439 OF 2014
IN
SUIT NO. 166 OF 1941
Shridhar Vithal Parulekar…Applicant
In the matter between
Pokhraj Himatmal…Plaintiffs
Versus
Shridhar Vithal Parulekar…Defendants
Mr.Ramakant Paranjape, for the Applicant. Mr.Ketan Trivedi, 1st Asstt to Court Receiver.
CORAM: G.S. PATEL, J DATED: June 23, 2014
PC:-
1.Pursuant to the directions dated 11th April 2014, service of
this Notice Motion has been effected by substituted service and
advertisement in two newspaper i.e. ‘Free Press Journal’ and
‘Navshakti’. An affidavit of service dated 29th April 2014 is on file.
1 of 2
23-NMS-4392014.DOC
2.For the reasons set out in the affidavit in support of the
Notice of Motion is made absolute in prayer clauses (b) and (c). By
way of abundant caution, it is clarified that the Court Receiver
stands discharged without passing accounts. All concerned to act
on authenticated copy of this order. Certified copy expedited.
(G. S. PATEL, J.)
2 of 2
Shridhar Vithal Parulekar
Pokhraj Himatmal
G.S. PATEL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court