M/S. Paraamursh Consultants Pvt. Ltd. v. Asset Reconstruction Company and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court at Bombay dismissed a notice of motion in a suit as withdrawn by the plaintiff's counsel.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
nms 3752-2011.doc
1/1
sat
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 3752 OF 2011 IN SUIT NO. 2962 OF 2011
M/s.Paraamursh Consultants Pvt.Ltd. …Plaintiff / Applicant
vs.
Asset Reconstructions Company (India) Ltd. & Ors.
...Defendants
Mr.Rohan Cama i/b. M/s.Apte & Co. for Plaintiff. Mr.Simil Purohit with Mr.Vinod Kothari for Defendant No.1. Mr.Parikshit Desai i/b. Mr.Hiren Mehta for Defendant No.4. Mr.Pavan S. Patil for Defendant No.9.
CORAM : S.C. GUPTE, J.
21 AUGUST 2014
P.C. :
Learned Counsel for the Plaintiff does not press the present Notice of Motion and seeks leave to withdraw the same. The Notice of Motion is dismissed as withdrawn.
2 The suit is set down as an Undefended Suit against Defendant Nos.5, 6, 7 and 10. Defendant Nos.2, 3, 4 and 9 have already filed their respective written statements in the suit.
3 Learned Counsel for Defendant No.1, who is the main contesting Defendant, submits that he will file its written statement within a period of one week from today. Other Defendants to file their written statement, if any, within two weeks from today.
4 Place this suit for framing of issues on 12 September 2014.
M/s. Paraamursh Consultants Pvt. Ltd.
Asset Reconstructions Company (India) Ltd.
S.C. GUPTE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court