This order recorded consent terms between the plaintiff and defendant No. 1 regarding Suit No. 2729 of 2008 and disposed of both the suit and the Notice of Motion in terms of the consent.
Suit and Notice of Motion disposed of in terms of consent terms; no specific relief details provided.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
nitin
NMS-3218-2008-901
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 3218 OF 2008
IN
SUIT NO. 2729 OF 2008
Parle Agro Private Limited … Plaintiff Versus Heinz India (P) Limited & Others. … Defendants.
Mr. Xerxes Ranina & Ms. Bhavana Shinde i/b. Neolegal Associates for the Plaintiff.
Ms. Mitali Basu, the Legal Representative of the Plaintiff.
Mr. L.R. Odhekar a/w. Mr. Rakesh Reddy for the Defendant No. 1.
CORAM: S.J.KATHAWALLA, J. DATE: 3 rd, APRIL, 2014
P.C .
The Advocates for the parties have tendered the Consent Terms dated 3rd April, 2014. They submit that the Consent Terms be taken on record and the Suit be disposed of in terms of the Consent Terms. No reliefs are sought against the Defendant Nos. 2 and 3 in the Suit and, therefore Defendant Nos. 2 and 3 have not been parties to the Consent Terms. The Consent Terms are taken on record and marked 'X' for identification. The Consent Terms are signed by the authorized signatory of the Plaintiff, authorized signatory of the Defendants and the Advocates for the Parties. The Suit is disposed of in terms of the Consent Terms. Accordingly, the Notice of Motion also stands disposed of. Refund of Court Fess, if any as per Rules.
Heinz India (P) Limited
S.J. Kathawalla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
