duly produced by the respondent which enabled them to effect the said refund. The learned counsel appearing for the respondent/original petitioner states that as far as the second amount of Rs.45,07,704/- is concerned, the respondent is not in a position to produce such BRC as it is not available. Mr. Ferreira, learned Asst. Solicitor General appearing for the applicant upon instructions states that in the peculiar facts of this case, the applicant would refund the said amount of Rs.45,07,704/- subject to the respondent executing an indemnity bond to the satisfaction of the applicant against any third party claim in respect of the said amount being refunded to the respondent. This order is being passed in the peculiar facts of the case in view of the said statement of Mr. Ferreira, learned Asst. Solicitor General appearing for the applicant only in respect of the said refund of Rs.45,07,704/- which is the subject matter of the present application. The order passed by this Court dated 26.03.2014 is accordingly modified in the above terms as far as the said sum of Rs.45,07,704/- is concerned. Apart from the said modification, the order passed by this Court shall continue in operation.