Allowed
Ultratech Cement Limited and Anr. v. Gangotri Cement Limited
Bombay HCLPETN/203/2014
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
903-LPETN-2032014.DOC
ars
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
PETITION NO. 203 OF 2014
WITH
SUIT (L) NO. 679 OF 2014
UltraTech Cement Limited…Petitioners
Versus
Gangotri Cement Limited…Respondents
Dr. Veerendra V. Tulzapurkar, Senior Advocate, a/w Mr. Amit
Jamsandekar, i/b M/s. V.A. Associates, for the Plaintiffs.
Mr. B. N. Poojari, i/b M/s. Asian Patent Law, for the Defendants.
CORAM: G.S. PATEL, J DATED: July 22, 2014
PC:-
1.For the reason set out in the affidavit in support, Petition is
made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a).
(G. S. PATEL, J.)
1 of 1
UltraTech Cement Limited
Gangotri Cement Limited
G.S. PATEL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court