Appellant wife challenged Family Court order directing cohabitation. An additional proceeding resulted in divorce decree. Court held nothing survives appeal and dismissed it.
No order as to costs
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
fca21.07.doc
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 21 OF 2007
Vaishali w/o Yuvraj Wahul .. APPELLANT
VERSUS
Yuvraj s/o Bhaginath Wahul .. RESPONDENT
Mr. P. S. Pawar, advocate for appellant. Mr. S. V. Adwant, advocate for respondent.
=====
CORAM : R.M. BORDE & V. K. JADHAV, JJ. DATE : 15th SEPTEMBER, 2014.
PER COURT :
fca21.07.doc
2
( V. K. JADHAV ) ( R. M. BORDE ) JUDGE JUDGE
dyb
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Vaishali w/o Yuvraj Wahul
Yuvraj s/o Bhaginath Wahul
R.M. BORDE
V. K. JADHAV
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
