Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

Swissgen Nv Vs M/S Goldcrest Exports — Arbitration | Bombay HC (2014)

Home
Bombay HC
2014
Swissgen Nv Vs M/S Goldcrest ExportsSwissgen Nv v. M/S Goldcrest Exports

Disposed

Swissgen Nv v. M/S Goldcrest Exports

Bombay HC7 Apr 2014EXA/32/2006

Case brief

from the order text

What is this about?

COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

A

kvm

1/1

3-EXA32.06

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION

EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 32 OF 2006 IN ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 164 OF 2005 IN ARBITRAL AWARD DATED 13TH AUGUST 2004

Swissgen N.V.

..... Applicants

VERSUS

Goldcrest Exports & Anr.

….. Respondents

Ms.Mona Malvade, a/w. Mr.Javed Gaya for the Applicants.

Mr.Archit Jaykar, i/b. Jaykar & Partners for the Respondents.

Parties & counsel

AI extract

applicant
Swissgen N.V.
respondent
Goldcrest Exports & Anr.

Coram

AI extract

R.D. DHANUKA

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Bombay HC
Decided on: 7 Apr 2014 · April
Registered: 23 Jan 2006
Case no.: EXA/32/2006

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from R.d. Dhanuka

The Special Land Acqn. Officer (3). Vs Jayantilal P. Shah. and Orsthe Dy.G.Manager (P) M.T.N.L.
4 Apr 2014
Premier Ltd. Vs Bombay Cycle and Motor Agency Ltd.
4 Apr 2014
Ramesh Sobhraj Manwani Vs Meena Mohan Manwani and 3 Ors.
4 Apr 2014
Mr.Lalitkumar Vanmalidas Sanghvi Vs Harishandas v. Sanghvi and Ors.
7 Apr 2014

Cite this judgement

Swissgen Nv v. M/S Goldcrest Exports, EXA/32/2006 (BOM), decided on 7 April 2014.

The Bombay High Court publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Bench / Coram

R.D. DHANUKA

Parties & counsel

Disposed

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

CORAM : R.D. DHANUKA, J. DATED : 7^th APRIL, 2014

P.C .

Learned counsel appearing for parties have tendered Consent Terms dated 7^th April, 2014 duly signed by both parties and their respective advocates. Consent Terms are taken on record and marked 'X' for identification. Execution application is disposed of in terms of Consent Terms. Undertaking if any recorded, is accepted. No order as to costs.

[R.D. DHANUKA, J.]

CNR

HCBM020198042005

Topic

Bench

Disposal

DISPOSED OFF

sasmita investments Ltd. Vs appropriate authority and 18 Ors.

7 Apr 2014

Sanjeev Ramesh Doshi Vs Sunil Ramesh Doshi (Caveator/Resp)

7 Apr 2014