The High Court at Aurangabad disposed of Civil Revision Application No. 44 of 2010 as infructuous because the main matter had been disposed of, discharging the rule.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
cra44.10
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.44 OF 2010
(Shivaji Nivrutti Tambade & ors. vs. Shiubai Namdeo Bade & ors.)
Office Notes, Office
Memoranda of Coram,
appearances,Court’s
orders or directions
and Registrar’s orders.
Court’s or Judge’s Orders
Shri.B.R. Kedar Advocate for Applicants.
CORAM: A.I.S. CHEEMA, J.
ORDER:
1. Learned counsel Shri. B.R. Kedar for
Applicants submits that Revision Application
has become infructuous as the main matter
itself is disposed of. He accordingly states
that the Revision Application may be disposed
of as such.
2. Revision Application is disposed of as
infructuous. Rule stands discharged.
[A.I.S. CHEEMA,J.]
asb/JAN14
Shivaji Nivrutti Tambade
Shiubai Namdeo Bade
A.I.S. CHEEMA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court