The petitioners were absent without notice. The High Court of Judicature at Bombay dismissed the Company Petition No. 84 of 2013 without recording reasons.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
21CP84-2013.DOC
Vishal
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION COMPANY PETITION NO.84 OF 2013
M/s. Maruti Ad Agency…Petitioners
Versus
Peacock Media Limited.Respondents
Nonefor the Petitioner.
None for the Respondent.
CORAM:G.S. PATEL, J
DATED:APRIL 10, 2014
PC:-
1.The petitioners and their advocates are absent. They were
also absent on 28th November 2013.
2. The petition is dismissed.
(G. S. PATEL, J.)
1 of 1
M/s. Maruti Ad Agency
Peacock Media Limited
G.S. PATEL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court