Petitioners sought to withdraw their Company Petition No. 393 of 2012 with liberty to adopt further proceedings. The Court granted leave to withdraw the petition while keeping all contentions open.
Leave granted to withdraw petition with liberty to adopt appropriate proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
20.cp.393.12.doc
Shephali
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
COMPANY PETITION NO. 393 OF 2012
M/s. Khurana Constructions.....Petitioners
Versus
Jindal Cocoa Ltd. (A Division of
Jindal Drugs Ltd.)....Respondents
____________
Mr. Devanshu Desai a/w Mr. Rohaan Cama i/b M/s. Singhania
Legal Services for the Petitioners.
Mr. Naushad Engineer a/w Sumit Ragani i/b M/s. PDS &
Associates for the Respondents.
CORAM: G. S. PATEL, J.
DATED : FEBRUARY 5, 2014.
P.C.:
1. Learned Advocate for the petitioners seeks leave to withdraw the petition with liberty to adopt appropriate proceedings.
2. Leave granted. Petition is allowed to be withdrawn with liberty as prayed.
3. All contentions of all parties are kept open.
(G. S. PATEL, J.)
1 of 1
M/s. Khurana Constructions
Jindal Cocoa Ltd. (A Division of Jindal Drugs Ltd.)
G. S. PATEL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court