A contempt petition regarding delay in starting a school was disposed of with no costs after the respondent accepted the delay and tendered an apology, noting the order was implemented.
Contempt petition disposed of with no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(1) C.P. No. 190 of 2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AT AURANGABAD.
Contempt Petition No. 190 of 2014 (In Writ Petition No. 9931 of 2012)
The Village Panchayat, At & Post - Kaudgaon, Taluka : Paranda, District : Osmanabad, Through its Sarpanch, Ashokrao Laxman Padule. .. Petitioner.
versus
The State of Maharashtra, Through Principal Secretary to Secondary School Education Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai - 32, & 2 others. .. Respondents.
Mr. S.T. Shelke, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. G.R. Ingole, Assistant Government Pleader, for respondent no.1.
Respondent nos.2 and 3 served (Absent).
CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI & A.M. BADAR, JJ.
DATE : 9TH DECEMBER 2014
(2) C.P. No. 190 of 2014
COURT'S ORDER (Per B.P. Dharmadhikari, J.) :
2. Perused reply affidavit.
( A.M. BADAR ) ( B.P. DHARMADHIKARI ) JUDGE JUDGE
puranik / CP190.14
The Village Panchayat, At & Post - Kaudgaon, Taluka : Paranda, District : Osmanabad, Through its Sarpanch, Ashokrao Laxman Padule
The State of Maharashtra, Through Principal Secretary to Secondary School Education Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai - 32
2 others
B.P. Dharmadhikari
A.M. Badar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
