Petition disposed through consent settlement. Court accepted consent terms filed and marked for identification, and ordered the consent undertaking accepted. No costs awarded.
Order passed pursuant to settled consent terms; no costs awarded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
agk
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
COMPANY PETITION NO.190 OF 2012
A.S. Shah, Prop. of M/s. Vimal Trading Co...Petitioners.
Versus
M/s. Vital Health Care Pvt. Ltd...Respondents.
Mr. Simil Purohit i/by Mr.Vinod Sharma, for the Petitioners.
Mr. Paresh Mankad i/by P.D. Kadam, for the Respondents.
CORAM : G.S. Patel, J. Monday, 20th January 2014.
P.C. :
1.The petitioner and respondents have amicably settled their differences.
Consent terms have been drawn up. These have been signed by the petitioner
and on behalf of the respondents. Learned Advocates for the parties identify
the signatures of their respective clients.
2.There will be an order in terms of the consent terms, taken on file and
marked 'X' for identification. Undertakings, if any, in the consent terms are
accepted as undertakings to this Court.
3. The petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs.
(G.S. Patel, J.)
1 of 1
A.S. Shah
M/s. Vital Health Care Pvt. Ltd
G.S. Patel
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court