The High Court disposed of a writ petition on merits based on a tendered amicable settlement via Minutes of Order. The court vacated the status-quo order and allowed the substitution of petitioner names.
Ruled in terms of Minutes of Order; status-quo order vacated; leave to substitute petitioner names granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP. 1942-95, CHW. 29-14
VPH
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION No. 1942 OF 1995 WITH CHAMBER SUMMONS No. 29 OF 2014
P. G. Kushte & Ors.
... Petitioners
Vs. MHADA & Ors. ... Respondents
Mr. M. M. Vashi, Sr. Counsel with Ms. Aparna Deokar i/b M. P. Vashi & Associates, for the Petitioners.
Mr. P. G. Lad, for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2.
Mr. V. A. Thorat, Sr. Counsel with Lakshmi Murli, for Respondent No.4 Ms. K. H. Martak, for Respondent No. 5.
CORAM : V. M. KANADE, & A. K. MENON, JJ.
DATE : APRIL 1, 2014
PC.
1 / 2
WP. 1942-95, CHW. 29-14
attached to the Chamber Summons, whose names are mentioned in the 'Minutes of the Order'. Chamber Summons No. 29 of 2014 is accordingly allowed and disposed of.
Vinayak Halemath
2 / 2
P. G. Kushte & Ors.
MHADA
V. M. KANADE
A. K. MENON
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
