Allowed
Mrs. Usha Shiv Bhardwaj v. Ramesh Ramrao Wandrekar and Ors.
Bombay HCCHS/969/2012
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
908-CHS969-12.DOC
agk
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 969 OF 2012
IN
SUIT NO. 1574 OF 1997
Sharda Krishna Phadtare & ors....Applicants
In the matter between
Mrs. Usha Shiv Bharadwaj…Plaintiff
Versus
Ramesh Ramrao Wandrekar & ors.…Defendants
Mr. C.M. Kothari, for the Plaintiffs in Suit No. 1594 of 1997.
Mr. A.S. Khandeparkar, for Defendant No. 23 in Suit No. 1594 of
1997.
Mr. V.R. Tripathi , i/b M/s. V.R. Tripathi & Associates for Defendants No. 15A & 15B in Suit No. 1594 of 1997.CORAM:G.S. PATEL, J
DATED:3rd July 2014
PC:-
1. Not on board. Mentioned. By consent, taken up for hearing and final disposal.
2.For the reasons set out in the affidavit in support of the
Chamber Summons, the Chamber Summons is made absolute in
terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b).
1 of 2
908-CHS969-12.DOC
3. Amendment to be carried out on or before 15th July 2014.
(G. S. PATEL, J.)
2 of 2
G.S. PATEL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court