Allowed an application to amend the plaint in Suit No.456 of 2013 on or before 10-01-2014 with consequential proceedings, and fixed the suit for directions on 13-01-2014. Judgment is purely procedural with no substantive holding.
Permission granted to amend the plaint as per the attached schedule, to be executed by 10-01-2014.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CHS 665 of 2013 (912)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICTURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.665 OF 2013
IN
SUIT NO.456 OF 2013
M/s. Kiran Motion Pictures Limited .....Applicant/Plaintiff Versus Dipak G.N.Nanglia and Ors. .....Defendants and You Tube, LLC …..Respondent
None for Applicant/Plaintiff
Mr. Rajesh Khandelwal i/by Mr. Savina Bangera, for Defendant No.2. Ms. Rhia Marshal i/by M/s. Economic Laws Practice, for Defendant No.3.
CORAM: S.J.KATHAWALLA, J. DATE: 6 th JANUARY 2014
P.C. :
thereto. The Chamber Summons is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a),
which reads as follows :
(a) That the Hon'ble Court be pleased to allow the Plaintiff to amend the Plaint in accordance with the Schedule annexed hereto and all other consequential proceedings;
The Chamber Summons is accordingly disposed of.
( S.J.KATHAWALLA, J. )
1/1
ssp
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the application to amend the plaint under Order VI Rule 17 CPC should be allowed.
M/s. Kiran Motion Pictures Limited
Dipak G.N. Nanglia
You Tube, LLC
S.J. Kathawalla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
