Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

Shri. Dinkar Ganpat Ahire Vs the State of… — Writ and Judicial Review | Bombay HC (2014)

Home
Bombay HC
2014
Shri. Dinkar Ganpat Ahire Vs the State of MaharashtrShri. Dinkar Ganpat Ahire v. the State of Maharashtra, throu

Allowed

Shri. Dinkar Ganpat Ahire v. the State of Maharashtra, through Principal Secretary, Finance Dept and Ors.

Bombay HC12 Sept 2014CAW/567/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Allowed the civil application and restored the writ petition to file.

What did the court decide?

Civil application allowed; Writ petition restored to file.

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

Civil application allowed; Writ petition restored to file.

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

The Civil Application was allowed for reasons stated in the application, resulting in the restoration of the Writ Petition to file. No substantive legal proposition is developed in this order.

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

A

567.14-caw.sxw

1/1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE

CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 567 OF 2014 IN

WRIT PETITION NO. 7822 OF 2012

Shri Dinkar Ganpat Ahire. ... Applicant. V/s. The State of Maharashtra and others. ... Respondents.

J.N.Kamble i/b. Kranti Kamble for the applicant.

CORAM : NARESH H. PATIL AND B.P.COLABAWALLA, JJ. DATED : 12th September 2014.

P.C. :

Heard.

For the reasons stated in the application application is allowed. Writ petition is restored to file.

(B.P.COLABAWALLA, J.) (NARESH H. PATIL, J.)

Sanjay Nanoskar, P.S..

Parties & counsel

AI extract

applicant
Shri Dinkar Ganpat Ahire
respondent
The State of Maharashtra

Coram

AI extract

NARESH H. PATIL
B.P.COALAWALLA

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Bombay HC
Decided on: 12 Sept 2014 · September
Registered: 24 Feb 2014
Case no.: CAW/567/2014
CNR: HCBM010021002013
Topic: Writ and Judicial Review
Bench: B.p. Colabawalla Naresh H. Patil

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from B.p. Colabawalla Naresh H. Patil

Union of India and Ors. Vs Subhash S. Birhade and Anr.
11 Sept 2014
Devendra Baburao Vanmali Vs Nasik Municipal Cor. and Anr.
11 Sept 2014
Anil Sidram Gaikwad Vs Nasik Municipal Cor. and Anr.
11 Sept 2014
Shri. Ankush Bhujangrao Hotkar Vs the State of Maharashtra, through Additional Chief Secretary, Home Dept and Anr.
12 Sept 2014
Shri. Dinakar Ganpat Ahire Vs the State of Maharashtra, through Principal Secretary, Finance Dept and Ors.
12 Sept 2014
Shri. Vijay Laxmanrao Tribhuwan Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.
12 Sept 2014

Cite this judgement

Shri. Dinkar Ganpat Ahire v. the State of Maharashtra, through Principal Secretary, Finance Dept and Ors., CAW/567/2014 (BOM), decided on 12 September 2014.

The Bombay High Court publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Bench / Coram

NARESH H. PATIL and B.P.COALAWALLA

Parties & counsel