In Civil Application No. 350 of 2014, a petition by a bank for early hearing of an outstanding writ petition was dismissed. The court noted the backlog of older petitions and observed that the bank could seek vacation of interim relief if not heard earlier.
Application rejected; prayer for fixing early hearing date dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
caw-350.14
ash
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.350 OF 2014 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 356 OF 2012
Office Notes, Office memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or orders or directions & Judge’s orders. Registrar’s orders.
Shri Sajjad Husainai Patel for the Applicant/Org. Respondent No.2. Shri Ashutosh Kaushik along with Ms. Komal Khushalani i/by M/. Manilal Kher & Ambalal & Co. for the Original Petitioner.
CORAM : A.S. OKA & M.S. SONAK, JJ DATE : 14TH FEBRUARY 2014
P.C.:
. Heard learned counsel appearing for the
Applicant. Prayer is for fixing an early date of hearing of the Writ Petition of the year 2012. This Court is dealing with the very old Family Court Appeals of the year 2004 onwards and the Writ Petition of the year 1997 onwards. Therefore, no priority can be given to the hearing of this Petition of the year 2012, as of today.
2caw-350.14
ash
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to allow an application for fixing an early hearing date.
Whether to restrain the grant of interim relief without hearing.
Applicant Bank
Org. Respondent No.2
Original Petitioner
A.S. OKA
M.S. SONAK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court