This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
p-2-caw-2806-14
dss
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2806 OF 2014
IN
WRIT PETITION NO.8231 OF 2014 IN APPEAL NO.71 OF 2014
Farida Mohamed Usman Shaikh … Applicant/Petitioner Vs.
Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. and ors. ... Respondents
Mr. Milind Sakpal a/w. Ms Aisha Z. Ansari for the Applicant/Petitioner.
Mr. Sanjay Anbhavane for the Respondents.
CORAM : V. M. KANADE, AND M. S. SONAK, JJ.
DATE : 5 DECEMBER , 2014
P. C.
2] Since the applicant has already moved the DRAT, the request for extension cannot be granted. Accordingly, the Civil Application is disposed of.
Dinesh
1 / 1
Farida Mohamed Usman Shaikh
Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd.
V. M. Kanade
M. S. Sonak
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
