Allowed
Uday Purushottam Wadadekar v. State of Maharashtra, through Collector Ratnagiri and Ors.
Bombay HCCAW/255/2014
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 255 OF 2014
IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 5944 OF 2013
Uday Purshottam Wadadekar .. Petitioner
v/s.
State of Maharashtra & Ors. ..Respondent/s
Mr.Anant N. Namjoshi for the Petitioner.
CORAM : A.S.OKA &
M.S.SONAK JJ. DATED : 17th FEBRUARY, 2014
P.C. :
averments made in paragraph no.2 and 4 of the application, the same is
allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) to (c).
date.
[M.S.SONAK, J.] [A.S.OKA, J.]
pps 1/1
Uday Purshottam Wadadekar
State of Maharashtra
A.S. Oka
M.S. Sonak
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court