Allowed

Netra Ajit Vijayakar and Anr. v. Shankar Gajanan Velkar

Bombay HC11 Nov 2014CAW/2457/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed the application seeking permission to amend Writ Petition No. 7594 of 2006. The amendment brings the applicants on record as heirs and legal representatives of the deceased petitioner Shankar Gajanan Velkar.

What did the court decide?

Leave granted to amend the writ petition to bring applicants as heirs and legal representatives of the deceased petitioner on record.

Netra Ajit Vijayakar and Anr. Vs Shankar Gajanan… — Succession and Inheritance | Bombay HC (2014)

¶1

CA 2457-2014

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶3

CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2457 OF 2014 IN

¶4

WRIT PETITION NO. 7594 OF 2006

¶5

Shankar Gajanan Velkar	..	Petitioner
V/s
State of Maharashtra & Ors.	..	Respondents
And
Netra Ajit Vijayakar & Anr.	..	Applicants

¶6

Mr. Kevic Setalvad, Senior Advocate with Mr. Yashodeep Deshmukh, Ms. Hilla Boatwalla i/b Nanu Hormasjee & Co. for the applicants/ petitioner.

¶7

Mr. V.B. Thadani, A.G.P. for the respondent – State.

¶8

Mr. N.R. Prajapati with Mr. Rui Rodrigues for respondent no.7 – Union of India.

¶9

CORAM: MOHIT S. SHAH, C.J. & B.P. COLABAWALLA, J.

¶10

DATE : 11 NOVEMBER 2014

¶11

P.C.:

¶12

Having heard the learned counsel for the parties, we allow the application in terms of prayer clause 9(a) and permit the applicant to amend Writ Petition No. 7594 of 2006 by bringing on

1 of 2

Abs

CA 2457-2014

record the applicants – Netra Ajit Vijayakar and Varuna Shrikant Tambe as heirs and legal representatives of the deceased petitioner – Shankar Gajanan Velkar.

¶17

Amendment shall be carried out forthwith.

¶18

CHIEF JUSTICE

¶19

(B.P. COLABAWALLA, J.)

¶20

2 of 2

¶21

Abs

Netra Ajit Vijayakar and Anr. v. Shankar Gajanan Velkar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Netra Ajit Vijayakar and Anr. v. Shankar Gajanan Velkar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Miss. Prajakta Sanjay Sawant Vs Pullela Gopichand Chief National Coach Badminton Association of India and 3 Ors.

Nainesh Suresh Dolas Vs the Controller of Rationing and Vicil Supply and Ors.

National Peroxide Ltd.and Anr. Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Rogers Francis Nunes Vs the State of Maharashtra, through Principal Secretary, Urban Development Dept and Ors.

Rahul Chintamani Gajanan Velkar Vs Chintamani Gajanan Velkar

Adv. Nilesh Ojha Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.