This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
caost16625
ssp
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION ST.NO.16625 OF 2014 IN
REVIEW PETITION ST.NO.16537 OF 2014 IN
WRIT PETITION NO.12004 OF 2013
Office Notes, Office
Memorandam of Coram,
appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders
or directions and
Registrar’s orders
Mr.Vasant Raut for the Applicants
Ms M.P.Thakur, AGP for the Respondent Nos.1 2, 6 to 8
CORAM : A.S.OKA, &
M.S.SONAK,JJ.
DATE : AUGUST 8, 2014.
P.C.
1Heard the learned counsel for the
applicants and the learned AGP for
respondent Nos.1,2, 6 to 8. Sufficient
cause is made out. Delay is condoned.
(M.S.SONAK,J)(A.S.OKA,J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether sufficient cause is made out to condone the delay.
Applicants
Respondent Nos.1, 2, 6 to 8
A.S.OKA
M.S.SONAK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court