Civil Application filed to recall a writ order regarding interim relief. The Court held that the appeal was subordinate to the main writ petition which subsequently disposed of the interim relief issue, rendering the present application devoid of any proposition for consideration.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
MST CAW.2334.2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2334 OF 2013 IN WRIT PETITION NO.2159 OF 2013
Conservator of Forest and Director and others Applicants versus Dr.Mrs.Kalpana S. Suradkar and others Respondents
Mr.A.B.Vagyani, Additional G.P. For Applicants.
CORAM : MOHIT S. SHAH, C.J. AND M.S.SANKLECHA, J. DATE : 25 March 2014
PC :
(CHIEF JUSTICE)
Conservator of Forest and Director and others
Dr.Mrs.Kalpana S. Suradkar and others
MOHIT S. SHAH
M.S.SANKLECHA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
