The High Court of Bombay allowed an amendment to a writ petition at the pre-admission stage on the basis of subsequent events, permitting service on the fifth respondent via court and private service.
Amendment to the petition allowed; petition to be placed for admission; notice issued to fifth respondent.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Pvr 1/1 48caw1923-14.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1923 OF 2014 IN WRIT PETITION NO.4746 OF 2014
Sathi Bashir Ahemad Bashamiya Shaikh. ...Applicant/Petitioner. Vs. 1.Dr.Pravin Nilkanth Gedam & Ors. ...Respondents
Mr.Ashok Tajane, for the Petitioner/Applicant.
Mrs.M.P.Thakur, AGP for Respondent no.6.
CORAM: A. S. OKA & G. S. KULKARNI, JJ.
DATED: 16th SEPTEMBER, 2014.
P.C. :-
(G. S. KULKARNI, J.) (A.S.OKA, J.)
Sathi Bashir Ahemad Bashamiya Shaikh
Dr. Pravin Nilkanth Gedam
A. S. Oka
G. S. Kulkarni
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
