The court allowed an application seeking an extension of time in respect of a writ petition, based on the factual statements provided regarding the case facts.
Application allowed in terms of the prayer clause (a) granting extension of time.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
caw-1894-14 in wp-123-14.doc
Ladda-PA
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION No.1894 of 2014
IN
WRIT PETITION No. 123 of 2014.
Office Notes, Office Memoranda Court's or Judge's orders. of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders.
Mr V.P.Malvankar, AGP A Panel for the applicants-State.
Mr Sharma i/by Vaibhav A.Sugdare for Respondent No.1.
CORAM : A.S. OKA AND A.S.CHANDURKAR,JJ. DATE : 14th August, 2014.
P.C.:-
Heard the learned Counsel appearing for the applicants and the learned Counsel for the first respondent and the learned Counsel appearing for the second respondent.
In view of the factual statements made in paragraph 2 of the application, a case is made out for grant of extension of time. Accordingly, the application is allowed in terms of the prayer clause (a).
(A.S. OKA,J)
1 / 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the application for extension of time should be allowed based on the factual statements made.
State
Respondent No.1
Respondent No.2
A.S. Oka
A.S. Chandurkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
