This order allowed Civil Application No. 1806 of 2014. The application was heard and the court granted relief purely based on the prayer clause (a) without elaboration.
Application allowed in terms of prayer clause (a).
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Deshmane
1
11.CAW.1806-14.doc
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1806 OF 2014
IN
WRIT PETITION NO.4876 OF 2012 [Sana Mohammed Siddik Ansari Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors.]
Office Notes, Office Memorandam of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders
Court’s or Judge’s Orders
Mr.R.K. Mendadkar a/w. Helen Koli-Mandlik, for the Applicant. Mr. S.N. Patil, AGP, for Respondent Nos.1 & 2. Ms. Noorseema M.U. Baig, for Respondent No.3.
CORAM : A.S. OKA, AND A. S. CHANDURKAR, JJ. DATE : 12th AUGUST, 2014
P.C. :-
(A. S. CHANDURKAR, J.) (A. S. OKA, J.)
1 / 1
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sana Mohammed Siddik Ansari
State of Maharashtra
Respondent No.3
A.S. Oka
A.S. Chandurkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
