High Court allowed a civil application seeking an extension of time based on averments in the application, granting the specific prayer but refusing further time.
Extension of time granted in terms of prayer clause (a); no further time allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
caw-1798.14
1
pmw
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1798 OF 2014 IN
WRIT PETITION NO.4449 OF 2013
Office Notes, Office memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions & Registrar’s orders.
Court’s or Judge’s orders.
Mrs. M.P. Thakur, AGP, for the Applicants.
CORAM : A.S. OKA & G.S. KULKARNI, JJ.
DATE : 26th AUGUST, 2014
P.C.
. Heard the learned AGP for the Applicants. In view of the averments made in the Application and in particular paragraphs 2 and 3 thereof, a case is made out for grant of extension of time. Accordingly, Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). No further time shall be granted.
(G.S. KULKARNI, J ) (A.S.OKA, J )
1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an extension of time for filing is granted.
Applicants
A.S. OKA
G.S. KULKARNI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
