Single judge order allowing amendment application in a civil application, permitting amendment per rules and disposing of the matter.
Application for amendment allowed; amendment to be carried out according to rules.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
4.CAWNo.16412014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1641 OF 2014 in
WRIT PETITION NO. 10607 OF 2013
Suhas K. Malkar
... Applicant
vs. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ... Respondents
Mr.P.M.Mokashi, Advocate for the Applicant. Mrs.M.S.Bane, 'B' Panel, A.G.P. for Respondent No.1.
Mr.B.L.Mangale i/by A.J.Unival, Advocate for the Respondent No.2.
CORAM :NARESH H.PATIL &
RAVINDRA V.GHUGE, JJ. DATED :11TH JULY, 2014
P.C.
(RAVINDRA V.GHUGE,J.)
(NARESH .H.PATIL, J.)
1/1
Gaikwad RD
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Suhas K. Malkar
The State of Maharashtra
Anr
NARESH H.PATIL
RAVINDRA V.GHUGE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
