This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
PIL81-13
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No . IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 81/2013
(HEMANDAS TUKAMDAS GYANCHANDANI & OTHERS VERSUS STATE OF MAH. & OTHERS)
Shri A.R. Ingole, counsel for the petitioners. Mrs. B.H. Dangre, G.P. for the R-1 to 4. Shri P.R. Agrawal, counsel for the R-5.
CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK AND
P.R. BORA, JJ. DATE : SEPTEMBER 10, 2014.
Stand over to 24.09.2014 for further consideration.
C.A.O. NO.569/2014 .
Heard.
The prayer made in the application is granted. The necessary amendment should be carried out within a period of one week. The civil application is allowed and disposed of.
Learned counsel Shri P.R. Agrawal waives notice on behalf of the newly added respondents.
JUDGE JUDGE
APTE
Hemandas Tukamdas Gyanchandani and Others
State of Maharashtra
Others
Vasanti A. Naik
P.R. Bora
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
