The single-line order of the Nagpur Bench lists a cross objection for hearing in future along with a first appeal. The civil application is allowed in the terms specified and disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
0704cao517.14
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No . IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR
CIVIL APPLICATION (CAO) NO. 517 OF 2014 IN
FIRST APPEAL NO. 181 OF 2005
Madhukar Panchariji Kullarkar VERSUS Pramila Madhukar Kullarkar
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders
Court's or Judge's orders
Smt N. B. Kalamkar counsel for the respondent/applicant.
CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK AND A. S. CHANDURKAR, JJ. DATE : APRIL 07, 2014 .
Heard. Cross Objection No. 2 of 2012 may be listed for hearing along with First Appeal No. 52 of 1998. Civil Application is allowed in the aforesaid terms and disposed of.
JUDGE
JUDGE
svk
Madhukar Panchariji Kullarkar
Pramila Madhukar Kullarkar
Vasanti A. Naik
A. S. Chandurkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
