The High Court rejected the applicant's prayer for an early hearing date, holding that priority cannot be given to a 2011 appeal when Family Court Appeals from 2004 are pending.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
cam-327.13
ash
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.327 OF 2013 IN FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 99 OF 2011
Office Notes, Office memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions & Registrar’s orders.
Court’s or Judge’s orders.
Mrs. A.P. Purav for the Applicant.
CORAM : A.S. OKA & M.S.SONAK, JJ DATE : 7TH FEBRUARY 2014
P.C.:
. The Family Court Appeals from the year 2004 onwards are pending in this Court. Therefore, priority cannot be given to an Appeal of the year 2011. Hence, the prayer for fixing early date of hearing of the Appeal is rejected.
(M.S. SONAK, J) (A.S.OKA, J)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant priority for early hearing of a family court appeal filed in 2011 given pending appeals from 2004 onwards.
Mrs. A.P. Purav
A.S. Oka
M.S. Sonak
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court