This applicant's civil application sought condonation of delay in filing an appeal. The court held that sufficient cause was made out and disposed of the application accordingly.
Condonation of delay in filing the appeal allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Deshmane Deshmane
1
5.CAM.30-14.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.30 OF 2014 IN FAMILY COURT APPEAL [ST.] NO.1112 OF 2014
Sapana Sanadkumar Anumalla ..Applicant
Versus
Sanatkumar Nageshwarrao Anumalla ..Respondent
Mr. Dushyant Purekar i/b. Mr. Anand S. Kulkarni, Advocate for the Applicant. None for the Respondent.
CORAM : V. K. TAHILRAMANI, & A. R. JOSHI, JJ. DATE : 27th AUGUST, 2014
P.C.
(V. K. TAHILRAMANI, J.)
1 / 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether sufficient cause is made out to condone delay in filing the family court appeal.
Sapana Sanadkumar Anumalla
Sanatkumar Nageshwarrao Anumalla
V. K. Tahilramani
A. R. Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
